People who say SMT doesn't need a good story to be good haven't played a SMT game.

^Wait a minute there's people that says THIS?

Yeah there’s a bunch of people coping with V as if previous games didn’t have decent stories.

I mean it doesnt. I thought the story and characters were poor, while the world/gameplay/music more than made up for it

What world? You spend 95% of the game in a barren desert lol. It's got good gameplay and music but that isn't gonna keep me around fora 50+ hour JRPG. Game makes a strong first impression but loses steam and falls off pretty hard.

It's not just barren desert and they rock change it up in all areas, area 4 being absolutely awesome. Anyways again, the exploration combined with the other aspects make it great to me, along with others

the only part that actually fucking changes is the last one lmao otherwise it's just "sand" and "red sand"

no the areas are distinct despite all being post-apocalyptic (which is very based)

oh yeah! there are also "generic destroyed buildings" and "generic destroyed roads"

and it's obviously post-apocalyptic lmao it's smt yk

yeah aka it's based. Obviously we dont agree and thats fine, me and others still thought it was great

Me trying to figure out what about the areas is distinct other than the sand color after 50 hours

🤨