4 Comments
@deadlydonut I find it unnecessary because Pokémon and Game Freak need no defense whatsoever, they’re not games and companies to feel sorry about.
This comment was deleted
Sure, but art is never a direct statement or a tweet, even if sometimes the creator wants it to be. I do find that it can sometimes feel like it preaches a certain rhetoric that is a bit defensive of those games or even the unhealthy way in which they come to release; but even that comes across as too ambiguous to be declared "unnecessary" as if viewed through the lens of factual argumentation. It didn't feel to me like it wanted to desperately defend Game Freak so much as it wanted to showcase a very personal perspective into what it means to be a long-time fan of these games for its author.
At least to me that argumentation opens up a rather cynical, content-based form of analyzing art that is detached from the intricacies present in the processes of its form. (deleted my former comment because of a typo)
At least to me that argumentation opens up a rather cynical, content-based form of analyzing art that is detached from the intricacies present in the processes of its form. (deleted my former comment because of a typo)
I don't see it as any thing personal, more like the opposite: just a very generic feeling of a whole generation, which is not necessarily bad, just nothing worth highlighting. But other than that there is little to say about anything here, instead it feels more like a rant of someone not wanting people to criticise something just because they liked it as kids.
deadlydonut
23 days ago