For a game that is ostensibly a send up to the classics of the genre, Sea of Stars seemingly does not understand a single thing about what makes those games so timeless.
There's a certain level of insincerity that permeates the whole experience. The writing feels very concerned with letting the player know that they're in on the fact that JRPGs are steeped in tropes and can be a bit silly, but all those winks at the camera inherently make me less invested in the world and characters, because it feels like the person writing this actually doesn't like what the genre is but rather what they perceive it to be. There wasn't any moment that I felt like the game was trying to say anything of any value, not even something as simple as "friendship is good" is articulated well, because the characters that are involved in those friendships aren't believable at all. Then out of nowhere they'll dump a bunch of lore on you that seems completely irrelevant to the actual plot or characters of this game, and I assume that's because large chunks of it are related to The Messenger or are setting up more threads to be continued in a later game? Either way the lore dumps aren't actually interesting and often times come off as extraordinarily edgy and completely at odds with the rest of the tone. All this without mentioning that virtually every plot beat of the game is 1:1 ripped from Chrono Trigger and rearranged in a way that only seems to undermine the efficacy of those moments.
The combat system likewise feels like it's a bunch of disparate mechanics stitched together from other games they liked without really considering why these elements haven't been combined before. The positioning mechanics lifted from Chrono Trigger and the action command system lifted from Super Mario RPG are obviously only included because the developers liked both of those mechanics on their own, and yes, both of those mechanics are fantastic in the games they originated in. However, it doesn't take long before you realize why these mechanics have never been combined, and that's because they are fundamentally at odds with each other. Action commands require action-game-like precision timing in order to execute at the maximum level of efficacy, but due to the random positioning of enemies you oftentimes end up missing timing because it wasn't clear where an enemy was in relation to you, or the timing of an attack was slightly different than usual because of the distance, or an enemy will completely obscure one of its comrades so you can't actually see their animation, or the UI will obscure an enemy, or an enemy or your party member will get stuck in a wall, and so on. This might not be such a big deal if the encounters were balanced in such a way that the action commands weren't completely essential to your survival, but unlike in a Mario RPG you're not dealing with tiny integers where the difference between a block and taking a hit is 1 HP, rather the difference between taking a block and a hit could be half of your life bar. It demands 100% of your attention from nearly every single encounter, and after a while that just becomes exhausting because each character only has 3 skills so you're never really getting any stronger so the entire experience just feels really flat.
The one thing that really did resonate with me was the dungeon design. I did find it really compelling overall, you can tell this is a team that cut their teeth on action games (for better and for worse). There's a constant forward momentum and while the puzzles aren't all that difficult to figure out, there's a certain joy in actually executing them that did feel like it came from that action game DNA.
All in all Sea of Stars really does feel like a tacky pastiche of better games made by a team that was really confident they understood what made the genre tick when in fact they did not. Love that pixel art doe.
There's a certain level of insincerity that permeates the whole experience. The writing feels very concerned with letting the player know that they're in on the fact that JRPGs are steeped in tropes and can be a bit silly, but all those winks at the camera inherently make me less invested in the world and characters, because it feels like the person writing this actually doesn't like what the genre is but rather what they perceive it to be. There wasn't any moment that I felt like the game was trying to say anything of any value, not even something as simple as "friendship is good" is articulated well, because the characters that are involved in those friendships aren't believable at all. Then out of nowhere they'll dump a bunch of lore on you that seems completely irrelevant to the actual plot or characters of this game, and I assume that's because large chunks of it are related to The Messenger or are setting up more threads to be continued in a later game? Either way the lore dumps aren't actually interesting and often times come off as extraordinarily edgy and completely at odds with the rest of the tone. All this without mentioning that virtually every plot beat of the game is 1:1 ripped from Chrono Trigger and rearranged in a way that only seems to undermine the efficacy of those moments.
The combat system likewise feels like it's a bunch of disparate mechanics stitched together from other games they liked without really considering why these elements haven't been combined before. The positioning mechanics lifted from Chrono Trigger and the action command system lifted from Super Mario RPG are obviously only included because the developers liked both of those mechanics on their own, and yes, both of those mechanics are fantastic in the games they originated in. However, it doesn't take long before you realize why these mechanics have never been combined, and that's because they are fundamentally at odds with each other. Action commands require action-game-like precision timing in order to execute at the maximum level of efficacy, but due to the random positioning of enemies you oftentimes end up missing timing because it wasn't clear where an enemy was in relation to you, or the timing of an attack was slightly different than usual because of the distance, or an enemy will completely obscure one of its comrades so you can't actually see their animation, or the UI will obscure an enemy, or an enemy or your party member will get stuck in a wall, and so on. This might not be such a big deal if the encounters were balanced in such a way that the action commands weren't completely essential to your survival, but unlike in a Mario RPG you're not dealing with tiny integers where the difference between a block and taking a hit is 1 HP, rather the difference between taking a block and a hit could be half of your life bar. It demands 100% of your attention from nearly every single encounter, and after a while that just becomes exhausting because each character only has 3 skills so you're never really getting any stronger so the entire experience just feels really flat.
The one thing that really did resonate with me was the dungeon design. I did find it really compelling overall, you can tell this is a team that cut their teeth on action games (for better and for worse). There's a constant forward momentum and while the puzzles aren't all that difficult to figure out, there's a certain joy in actually executing them that did feel like it came from that action game DNA.
All in all Sea of Stars really does feel like a tacky pastiche of better games made by a team that was really confident they understood what made the genre tick when in fact they did not. Love that pixel art doe.