Reviews from

in the past


Lo siento, no lo he jugado suficiente para hacer una reviwe - Yo

I'm a base building addict so not a fan of how the encouraged way to play is speedrunning to tanks and just bum rushing your opponent with like 12 of them. Other than that, incredibly solid and easy to get sucked into.

what even is this game.

absolutely daft dlc model to get new commanders & units.


best RTS I've ever played and probably won't be topped

company of heroes... ... more like .. .. . . company of THISBLOWSoes........

a fun strategy game, feels off to play after some point

Why do people like video games to railroad you into exactly what you need to do? I feel like a mouse who has to go down the right corridor in order to find the cheese playing games like this. Graphically this game is fun and immersive, but that quickly fades away and when you have very little in tactical options for resolving a problem.

Company of Heroes 2 is pretty much a straight improvement over the first entry in the series, but it worries me just how much content is locked behind microtransactions and loot drops. For the sake of comparison, the first game also had standalone expansions for new factions so that hasn't changed, but the commanders, skins and such are a little ridiculous. Not to mention the in-game ads for other Relic products.
Apart from that, I like that the main campaign focuses on the Eastern Front rather than the Americans for once, but it does fall into the typical clichés about the Soviet Army and it's not particularly well written or interesting. However, the missions are alright so I'd say that the level of quality is about on par with the first game.
I think I would recommend the game to people who want a solid RTS or just like WW2 as it's pretty accessible for the genre anyways.

Es una mierda este company, para jugarlo, mejor juego el original, para jugar con lo unico nuevo que tiene osea los rusos tenes que pagar dinero adicional!
anadte a re cagar!

Truly great WW2 strategy game. While it's ridiculous that you have to buy the Americans and British factions, the game remains one of the best that you can play. It's not a game that you can relax to though, constant micromanagement is needed to compete with other players which makes it not the best game to play for long periods at least to me. Fun to come back to every now and then.

actually not a bad rts from what i remember, i just haven't played it in ages

Great world war 2 themed rts game. Great modding community and an occasional competitive scene.

A Great RTS all together with an incredible story.

this that schnorgulangus kinda game

played it with friends seemed fun, but they told me that the game needs some balancing...

It's hard to say where this went wrong for me.

Relic make incredible strategy games, Dawn of War is honestly the best RTS ever made, and company of heroes 1 lacks content severly, but has some of the best squad based strategy mechanics ever made as far as I'm concered.

This is a strange, mechanically odd, system overloaded bloated mess. The ui is cramped, the strategy is hyper arcadey, this feels to me like this was made exclusivley to make comeptitve matches more viable, and the regular game less fun. Genuinely makes me sad

if ttk was any longer this would suck.


I'm not an RTS expert, nor a WWII obsessive, but this game was truly addictive for the short time it lasted. But that's only for the campaign though. I did not touch the multiplayer or anything. I don't remember anything about the story either, just that it was cliché and dumb.

jogo de nerdola, não não não

every RTS should be like this: micro-intensive, anti-zerg to the core, actual tactics rather than Kill Dudes.