Rockstar sacrificed some gameplay and controllability in exchange for a full cinematic experience and an extraordinary biography of Arthur Morgan. Most of the time, I am against the trade-off. The immersive experience of visualization is not what games do, it's what video works do -- if I play games to get lost in the story, why not watch a John Ford movie? But Red Dead Redemption 2 got it right and were not out of balance. Some of the details are too realistic to feel a little uncomfortable, but the overall is acceptable.

A few complaints:
1. Camera position switching was confusing at times, dialogue inexplably crossed axes, and there were a lot of meaningless bird's eye view shots.
2. The wide frame changes too often, as a sign of entering the fixed narrative phase, it's hard not to get noticed.

ALL GOLD MEDALS ✅