It is a game that can be considered as a kind of military simulation game where you fight against enemies in duplicate locations on a huge but empty map. Definitely don't play unless you have friends, otherwise you may get bored. You can go stealth or stern with different types of classes, and the game's variety of cosmetics and weapons is quite sufficient. In terms of story, it has a lot of boring side missions, and the main missions are no different from the side missions. Raid the place at point A, save someone, travel miles just to talk to someone, then return to point A and they will tell you the location of point C. Just great. As for the bosses, except for the last boss, the rest are no different from normal enemies, all they have to do is take a single bullet to the head. You have to do side quests to progress in most parts of the game, and there are very few main quests. You can finish the game in a short time by just doing the main quest, and since Ubisoft put more than half of the game's content in DLC and season passes, there is not much left. As a result, Ghost Recon Breakpoint could have been a more successful game if more attention had been paid to the main missions and if it had not buried all of its content in DLC and season passes, because it is an enjoyable game in terms of gameplay, but the boring story and mission design and the fact that it is constantly repetitive (which is Ubisoft's general problem) make the game easily difficult. It can get boring. As I mentioned, you can have a fun and easier experience with your group of friends, so I recommend playing co-op.

I played this as sort of an open world Splinter Cell and had a surprisingly good ol' time with it.

I enjoyed exploring this new setting and infiltrating all the modern installations built on this once untamed island. Really felt like I was behind enemy lines being hunted by a more advanced enemy.

Two things that did annoy me however: ran into a bug that basically made it impossible for me to finish the campaign, I didn't enjoy Ghost War PvP at all this time around compared to Wildlands

The Division if you took everything that makes it fun out of the game.

- Boring builds
- Lifeless world
- Bad enemy variety
- Clunky 3rd person cover based gameplay (often can't look above your cover)
- Trash AI
- Weird incoherent story

And to top it all off: The game always crashes when I start it through Steam instead of Ubisoft Connect.

Ghost Recon: Breakpoint falls short of its potential, offering a mixed experience. While it has a beautiful open world and some solid tactical elements, it's plagued by technical issues and repetitive gameplay, resulting in a 2.5/5 rating.

Another game lost to the looter live service model craze, or so you might think. Later patches to the game give you the choice of changing the gameplay into more of a Ghost Recon: Wildlands experience with slightly more depth to the pseudo-realistic operator experience. The skeleton of that experience is still built for a looter shooter, which makes the whole experience quite janky, but it's the closest thing to a open world stealth operator game, right behind MGS5, and you can even play it with your friends.

Where should I start. I've never played the older Ghost Recon games, the only games I've played from the series are Ghost Recon: Widlands (which I haven't finished) and Ghost Recon: Breakpoint (which I've finished). I'll say straight away that Ghost Recon: Breakpoint is a 2/5 game. The story is absolutely uninteresting and boring, the characters are uninteresting and I would absolutely not care if they died (not even my main character). The only thing that kept me playing the game was the gunplay and tactical stealth. The world is, of course, a classic Ubisoft open world. Another thing that is completely unnecessary is the weapon levels, which are completely irrelevant. For example, you can kill a level 20 enemy with a headshot, with a level 1 weapon and a level 50 weapon. I understand that some people might like the game, but for me this one is just bad.