ENG:
Nothing too significant to say, it's a good game. After half of it just becomes kinda repetitive, but you can bear it just because the story is a bit interesting. Nero gameplay is simple compared to Dante, but is good on it's own.

BR:
Nada demais pra falar, o jogo é bom. Depois da metade fica meio repetitivo, mas dá pra aguentar porque a história é pelo menos um pouco interessante. A gameplay do Nero é mais simples do que a do Dante, mas mesmo assim é boa.

I think it's just as good as 3.

Hum, no climbing towers with a motorcycle...

But Nero's combat is just perfect for the enemies, and it really flows.

Now...

Dante's... Sheesh... I mean... His combat is CLEARLY superior to Nero's, but it's so not designed for Nero's enemies... Playing as Dante in the story is pratically a torture, it should honestly be illegal. But fighing in the Arena with some of the enemies that actually work is one of the best combats ever.

I was so close to thinking this game was great but it fell off harder than anything else I've played during the second half. The ENTIRE second half of the game is just padding. You backtrack through all the game's levels until you reach the starting point, fighting the same bosses along the way. That's it. You don't even get a unique final level. Instead, you have to do a boss gauntlet where you fight each boss for a THIRD time. There is a unique climactic fight before the gauntlet, but the final boss? Once again, it's just a slightly stronger version of a boss you've fought before. What a letdown.

I would have preferred if they just ended the game as the first half concludes. That would have made for a short-but-sweet experience. But the game continues while pretending that it still has some cards left to play, even though as a player you're hyper-aware that it has used up all of its tricks. I know they ran out of budget, but that's no excuse for padding the game out like this. Don't make budgetary issues into the player's problem. Just end the game if you have nothing left to show.