Reviews from

in the past


Пройти кампанию один разок точно можно

La historia estaba guapa pero no entendía mucho. El multi ni lo toqué

I genuinely don't get the point of making a single-player Battlefield game and stripping it of everything Battlefield is known for.

This game is so frustrating. It repeatedly throws you into seemingly big open maps that in actuality are filled with invisible walls. On rare occasions the game lets you find a way to flank or circumvent the enemies, but it almost feels like you're not meant to do it. The level design here is actually more linear than in Call of Duty 4 or Medal of Honor 2010. In addition, it's full of extremely scripted missions where you're not allowed any freedom of choice, just like in Modern Warfare 2. Except it also doesn't have the nice visuals, weapon variety or spectacle of the latter.

The only thing that kinda makes it stand out is the physics. It's fun to tear buildings apart with explosives. Other than that, it's a generic military shooter that, btw, doesn't even have a prone function. How do you not have proning in a military shooter in 2010? Delta Force had it in 1998! AND actual big open maps with total freedom of movement. This is just embarrassing.

Also, consider me a killjoy, but I don't think a humorous story is appropriate for a military shooter. Are we supposed to be having fun with these dudebros while they're fulfilling America's imperialist ambitions? I didn't really pay much attention to the actual story (not that it was well-presented), but I had no idea who we were fighting. But I assume it's probably some evil Russians or evil South Americans or evil Middle-Easterners or some shit. Don't get me wrong, I don't expect much more from American military shooters, but at least treat the subject matter with seriousness. This is just plain disrespectful.