RATING BASED ON MODDED EXPERIENCE : https://youtu.be/U2QKt8BcV50
My rating for BFV is solely dependent on if you are playing it with Battlefield 1944 and other such related historical accuracy mods to vastly improve the immersive experience. Without these mods, BFV is more like a 5, but by making the game actually feel like the 'BF1 but in WWII' experience we were expecting it to be and what it should've been, it makes it almost surpass BF1 in some cases with the addition of crouch running, ledge grabbing, rolling, and other such movement additions.
The reason BFV still isn't a 5/5 with all these improvements is because support for the game has ended, and thus there are no Eastern Front maps, or proper late-war maps like originally intended had the game's lifespan been cut short.
My rating for BFV is solely dependent on if you are playing it with Battlefield 1944 and other such related historical accuracy mods to vastly improve the immersive experience. Without these mods, BFV is more like a 5, but by making the game actually feel like the 'BF1 but in WWII' experience we were expecting it to be and what it should've been, it makes it almost surpass BF1 in some cases with the addition of crouch running, ledge grabbing, rolling, and other such movement additions.
The reason BFV still isn't a 5/5 with all these improvements is because support for the game has ended, and thus there are no Eastern Front maps, or proper late-war maps like originally intended had the game's lifespan been cut short.
SINGLE PLAYER REVIEW
If I would rate this game for the multiplayer part of it, I would give it 4 stars, because I absolutely love it and I put many hours in it. Unfortunately, I rated the single player portion, the War Stories of Battlefield V.
What ruins this game is that DICE is trying to do something, that they are surprisingly bad at, which is storytelling.
DICE's campaigns are ridden with clichés and very mediocre at best (Battlefield 3 is an exception, I really like that campaign despite it's flaws), and during the development of Battlefield 1 they probably knew this. They focused a lot more on set pieces, teached the player the basics of the game, while they told decent stories.
In Battlefield V, cinematic storytelling got the main focus, which would not be a bad thing, if DICE could pull off something like that. Instead, they did a very generic compilation of stories, that this time, I do not want to get into in detail.
Still, the mechanics of the game are good, the graphics are beautiful, the gunplay feels fine, except that it is weird a bit compared to the multiplayer and etc etc.
Sadly, DICE left the game too early in favor of the now infamous Battlefield 2042.
If I would rate this game for the multiplayer part of it, I would give it 4 stars, because I absolutely love it and I put many hours in it. Unfortunately, I rated the single player portion, the War Stories of Battlefield V.
What ruins this game is that DICE is trying to do something, that they are surprisingly bad at, which is storytelling.
DICE's campaigns are ridden with clichés and very mediocre at best (Battlefield 3 is an exception, I really like that campaign despite it's flaws), and during the development of Battlefield 1 they probably knew this. They focused a lot more on set pieces, teached the player the basics of the game, while they told decent stories.
In Battlefield V, cinematic storytelling got the main focus, which would not be a bad thing, if DICE could pull off something like that. Instead, they did a very generic compilation of stories, that this time, I do not want to get into in detail.
Still, the mechanics of the game are good, the graphics are beautiful, the gunplay feels fine, except that it is weird a bit compared to the multiplayer and etc etc.
Sadly, DICE left the game too early in favor of the now infamous Battlefield 2042.
Não tenho muita coisa pra dizer sobre esse jogo.
A campanha é bem mais envolvente e bacana que a do BF1, a parte técnica do jogo é excelente, e o multiplayer é bem fraco, mesmo que a campanha tenha sido melhorada em relação ao BF1.
Fora que esse jogo se envolveu em várias polêmicas no lançamento. Típico da EA.
Se não fosse o multiplayer, acho que esse jogo seria um baita Battlefield.
A campanha é bem mais envolvente e bacana que a do BF1, a parte técnica do jogo é excelente, e o multiplayer é bem fraco, mesmo que a campanha tenha sido melhorada em relação ao BF1.
Fora que esse jogo se envolveu em várias polêmicas no lançamento. Típico da EA.
Se não fosse o multiplayer, acho que esse jogo seria um baita Battlefield.