Quite dissapointing to be honest, Aria of Sorrow is usually regarded as one of the best Castlevanias out there, and since I had only played classicvania part of the franchise so far, I was excited... But this game reminds me of Chasm.
I think the metroidvania genre has gotten so popular, and evolved so much through the indie industry these recent years, that this game feels almost outdated; movement is sooo clunky (and I don't care if this is how the franchise works by default), map layout is forgettable (with an incredibly generic UI), and even ambiences all look the same, there are just too many enemies, and none of them feel like they belong in their respectives areas; story is... the best they could do for the GBA I guess, characters are as charismatic as a door, and Soma is almost edgy (he got the drip tho).
I think that's it, I still wanna try SotN and CotM, but if this is the pattern, I might as well stick with classicvanias.

Reviewed on Feb 12, 2024


2 Comments


2 months ago

This is basically how I felt. I played all of SOTN and Bloodstained, all of CotM, and half of Harmony, and like yeah Aria doesn't live up to SOTN or Bloodstained. SOTN and Bloodstained have way more meat on their bones and felt like actual games and with fun exploration so I wouldn't stay away from them just because you thought Aria was a bit whatever since I feel the same way abt Aria. I really really don't like CotM but I liked what i played of Harmony of Dissonance more than what Aria so IDK. I hear the DS games live up the SOTN and Bloodstained hype tho. Def try out SOTN and Bloodstained if you wanted Aria but it actually lives up to tha hype.

2 months ago

I thought Bloodstained was a classicvania lol, but I'll definetely try SotN, glad to know it is in fact better than Aria