In 2013, a little game called Rayman Legends was released, and a 7-year-old me (this is the part where you comment on how young I am) would fall in love with the game’s release. The sheer variety in the game’s art style, music, and levels had me dumbfounded. I would play the hell out of the game’s demo on my Xbox 360, and when I finally got my hands on the full release, my love grew for it even more, and it stands as both one of my favorite platformers, and one of my favorite games of all time; and is a wonderful showcase of what video games can accomplish. In 2017, a tiny game called splasher was released, although I wouldn’t hear about it until this year when a friend of mine mentioned it to me. They mentioned that the team who made Splasher comprised of the same staff that worked on Rayman Legends, which made it an immediate must-play for me. Sadly however, I ended up disappointed by Splasher.

One thing that you immediately notice is the artstyle of the game. While it does have some charm due to looking like a high-tier Newgrounds or Xbox live arcade game, it's hard to deny that it lacks polish. Loading screens not having any animation, assets sliding around during cutscenes like someone dragging around a .png in an image editor, and other little tidbits throughout the game rob it of its charming artstyle. Game performance is also pretty poor, with lag spikes happening every so often, and even a game crash on my end. What also doesn’t help Splasher’s case is the fact that it takes place all in one location, a laboratory. There is an attempt made to spice up the level variety, but in most cases it’s a basic aesthetic change that feels at odds with how the levels are laid out due to a lack of flow between these themes. The level layouts also force you to go back and forth between multiple points within the hub worlds, which can get grating real fast.

Ink is the main gimmick Splasher, letting you traverse the levels in more unique ways and help solve puzzles for collectibles. However, the ink is also something the game never really nails. Throughout the game, your collection grows as you collect the 3 main types of ink. The progression of giving you this ink overtime rather than giving you all the abilities at the start. This is a common motif in games that I’ve never really been a fan of, because it personally makes me feel as if I’m playing two thirds of the game with an incomplete moveset and makes the earlier levels less fun as a result. The game never uses the ink to its fullest potential either, since after a level or two after getting a new type of ink, it becomes apparent that the level design can only think of the same few scenarios to use the ink in. It comes off as very repetitive as a result, and I think changing the layouts of the levels slightly or allowing for more experimental ways to play around with the ink would have been for the better.

The gameplay is another very noticeable downside to Splasher, with its fast and slippery movement, a lack of control in the air in certain circumstances, and a jump that feels like its arc was cut in half. These issues wouldn’t be much of a bother if the game were made for it, but Splasher takes inspiration from the more modern design philosophy of platformers to be more difficult, like Super Meat Boy, Celeste, or The End Is Nigh and it doesn’t gel well with the level design, making the difficulty seem like an afterthought. I found multiple points where deaths felt cheap or even unfair, resulting in many restarts within big chunks of the levels. The number of times I had to slow down in the middle of a fast jump to land on a platform was absurd and ruined the overall flow of the game. However, the gameplay really starts to take a nosedive when these issues are combined with the ink mechanic. Aiming the ink uses the same stick that you use to move, with no option to stay still while doing so. This is used to create a ‘think on your feet’-type of pace to the game, but since you go so fast this causes more issues than anything else, and the amount of times I found my ink would just not aim correctly resulted in handfuls of deaths that really tested my patience.

It's not really fair to compare Splasher to the team’s previous work on Rayman Legends. Splasher has its own unique gameplay, design, and is overall going for something completely different but even disconnecting it from Rayman, it still feels disappointing. I hate being negative about something that very clearly has a lot of passionate people working on it, but Splasher had too many kinks that I think could be ironed out before it could have been something truly great. I hope the team is able to make a sequel to this game that can address these issues and turn it into something truly worthwhile (which I have hope for because I’ve heard the studio’s other game, Tinykin, is pretty good!), but for now, Splasher remains a disappointing first go for the studio due to its overall lack of polish, variety, and engaging gameplay.

(special thanks to my friend ConeCvltist who helped me out a ton making this review)

This is actually a more "first impressions" type of review than anything else. Jackbox games, as party games, are meant to be replayed and I have only played each of them once. So my thoughts could definitely change in the future but for now heres the games and my thoughts on them

Fibbage 4 - In Fibbage 4 you gotta try and trick people in to picking your answer for a prompt while also not falling into anyone else's question. 1 truth, all lies. I love fibbage, so this was a guaranteed solid pick. Lying is fun especially about stupid things so bringing that into form with a party game turns out really well as well as making for some really fun trivia, if you couldn't guess by this being the 4th iteration of the game. I think this has to be my favorite Fibbage presentation-wise, it's all very clean and has more variety than other fibbages. One minute you'll be going from France to a TV watching a movie on VHS. The final round is also my favorite in fibbage, the whole 2 questions, 1 lie gimmick is fun, although a bit confusing on the first go round. Very solid time, definitely deserves to be a staple of jackbox. 9/10

Roomerang - From the perspective of a TV sitcom, you get a role to play as, decide how to react in situations, and try not to get eliminated. Right off the bat this has the potential to be one of the funniest jackbox games ever, with the right people. If you like to role-play even a little bit, this is the game for you. The roles can be chosen for you but I think what elevates it is that you can make your own roles, which is a really good addition, totally adds variety to your responses. Taking them more as what-if questions for the role your character has was also a good move to, makes it stand out mode from the other question and response games of Jackbox like Quiplash. The TV sitcom presentation is also way better than other attempts like Devil and the Details. I do think being eliminated off the show is a tad too punishing, one elimation can throw off the entire game for you, especially when how many people can be eliminated and whos the one chosing elimination varies throughout the game so it kinda boils down to luck at a certain point. Still, this one's insanely fun and I look foward to playing it again and again. 9/10

Junktopia - You've been turned into frog, and in order to back to being human you gotta pay a wizard, but to do this you go to your local thrift shop, buy an item, and sell it. It's simple and funny which sometimes is all you need. I love how they capture the feeling of striking gold at the thrift store. hey! not all of them will be winners but you might see a cool cow with sunglasses and the body count of ten trillion. The final round sucks hard tho. It's just you naming your collection of items, and since it can be a game deciding point it just seems lame considering all your doing is just slapping a name on two items. 8/10

Nonsensory - On a scale of 1 to 10, how does this make you feel? that's the question this game asks, whether it be drawings, answers, and more. It's a fun premise, being giving a scale and having to make something that fits on the scale is cool on paper. However, it can be clunky in practice because it's really hard to decide what the difference between a 3 or 4 for a prompt could be. More than any other game in the pack this game will give you the most chances to screw you over. Some prompts such as "Draw the scale of an office chair to a toilet, 80% office chair" is feasible, but "Draw the scale of a waitress to a princess, 80% waiter" is really tough and can screw both the author and the players if done improperly. When it works, it's pretty fun, but when it doesn't it REALLY doesn't. It's also not helped by the fact this games tutorial is nonexistent, they really do throw you right into it, and for such an already tough to parse game it wasn't for the better. 6/10

Quixort- In 2 seperate teams, you gotta rank things in a list, that's all there is to this one. What the game makes up for with a lack of complexity is the team dynamic. They've been doing more team games in jackbox and they prove to be really fun experiences for the most part. This one is no exception, the ranking aspect gives way for so much debate and interaction with your team unlike any other jackbox game yet. My only major problem is the lack of variety. You get to chose between 1 list or 1 mystery list, so if you get 1 choice you wouldn't do well on you have to risk it with what could possibly even worse. I feel like 1 more revealed prompt for a total of 3 could have balanced things out more but it's a minor blemish on a simple but really fun time. 8/10

Conclusion - This is definitely one of the funniest jackbox packs yet. Junktopia, Fibbage 4, and Roomerang all have the potential to be laughing riots with the right groups of people, while Quixort balances out with a more interactive play session with your buddies. Nonsensory dampens things out a bit for the pack, but it still doesn't deny the great quality this pack has.

Wow. I mean, I'm kinda blown away by this. For a PS1 game to have this much powerful imagery is kinda mind boggling for me. It gives birth to a dense and emotion packed story about abuse and manipulation, layered under the meticulously crafted setting. It honestly kinda makes me tear up inside, especially with how hopeful this games ending is, in spite of it being in an almost literal hell. Sure, the main combat is serviceable at best, the controls are a little bit clunky, and the bosses can be a bit tedious, but I feel like focusing on those things kinda misses the point. If youre playing silent hill for "the riveting gameplay" you need to play a mario game or something.

So, I know I have already done a review dismissing the game as a "reddit game." That review is a little popular, but I've been thinking about this game for the past few days again and I need to get my thoughts out.
Right out of the gate, this game is very critical of art as a concept. Themes of being suffocated, overworked, and tired by the concepts of art and what it could be or mean are expressed throughout the game. Such an example is an Applebees being destroyed revealing it as "art." Bubsy is immortalized as the epitome of a bad game in the gaming sphere. To the point where people talk about him as much as they would a good game. In a way Bubsy has become a statue, unchanging and unprecedented in its reception. The game ends with Bubsy getting a second chance by breaking out from his statue referencing the at the time up-coming revival of the Bubsy series. A main question raised throughout the game is if James Turrell can make art out of light or earth then does that make Applebee's or Bubsy 3D art? Well, according to Ben Esposito: no. In an interview with Esposito, he says the game ["[Uses] the aesthetics of a bad game in poorly executed edutainment in order to get people to interact with art, [gets people to] actually think about concepts related to art and the infinite. Being critical of the idea that games should could be art.”](https://killscreen.com/previously/articles/good-laugh-ben-esposito/amp/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16654923673909&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com)
So for one, the game's dismissal and smug additive towards light being an art form just feels misplaced. Art is the showcase of creative and imaginative power shown in visual form, whether it be paintings, sculptures, etc. James Turrell's artworks are meant to showcase the visual power of the brain. Turrell has a clear sense of artistry with light, and is an undeniable master with the form. He uses color as if it were from a brush painting out beautiful landscapes fully realized within reality. This fine comprehension for light within his work allows for some beautiful pieces. So yes, Turrell's use of light should definitely qualify as art. His artwork very clearly showcases the human skill and creativity required for the medium. Secondly, in response to Esposito's criticism of games as an art form this can go forth onto Bubsy 3D. Programmers, artists, game designers, and the rest of the team working on the game used their creativity and imagination to create something which we can call art. Now, whether that art is good or not is up for debate But regardless it can still be seen as "art" in one way or another. Same thing for Applebee's, whether you like their food or not architects worked to plan out and build the establishments. Food itself is also an art form. It requires people to use their creativity to create and cook new dishes for Applebees that families can eat. This is where Bubsy throws a punch with its criticism of art, by saying that this perception of so many things being considered art can be suffocating.
However, Arcane Kids biggest fault when engaging in these critiques of art is their absence of elaboration on their ideas. This absence even hurts some of the good points they make. I think you can clearly see this in their manifesto which for the most part reads like word vomit, by saying things just for the sake of saying them. Take the excerpt "Stop listening to advice" which is just a backwards and hypocritical thought process. They don't flesh out on what to do instead of listening for advice. It feels like Arcane Kids is demanding for you to stop listening to advice which in of itself is advice. There’s the saying “show don't tell” but there’s a difference between that and just “show.” This lack of contextualisation continues its way into Bubsy. Yes, perceiving so many things as art can be suffocating, but any points or perspectives on how we should be classifying art are never brought up. Art being seen as so many different things is only brought up because it is and nothing more. There are similar criticisms for the ending in which Bubsy rejects art for humanity because art has no relief. This ending is ambiguous in almost a nonsensical way. Bubsy rejects all practices of creative and imaginative works for "humanity." What "humanity" is doesn't really seem to be spelled out. Humanity could mean kindness, or just the human race in general. Maybe this confusion could have been avoided had Bubsy gained some sort of characterization other than "what if the annoying 90s platformer mascot became an art snob.” and Empty attempts at dadaism, absurdism, and overall reeking of the age old saying "I am 14 and this is deep" plague the game's duration as well. As a whole, how does rejecting art as a concept correlate to the human race? Once again, it just seems like Arcane Kids using word vomit, by not following up on anything they say.
Bubsy 3D: Bubsy Visits the James Turrell Retrospective is a game that has very little to say, and what it does have to say is shallow and pretentious. The game doesn't even have much to gain from outside of the message of the game. The gameplay is near Identical to Bubsy 3D (so not good) and collectibles are placed nonsensically and seem to offer no purpose to the overall game. Generally it's not worth playing over watching a video of someone else playing through the game. Reddit is a platform that has little to gain out of actually interacting with it. Most of the time you'll get a bunch of pretentious and shallow comments about whatever you decided to post. Whether it be a piece of art, or your opinion on a piece of media, it's generally not worth it. Do I need to connect the dots for you?

So the past few days have been rough for me, with school getting very intensive, I needed to relax. Fortunately, Kirby's adventure was there for me. The games whimsical locals, dreamlike backgrounds, and colorful exterior really go above and beyond to land the presentation of the game, especially so for an nes game. The game's wide variety of copy abilities, tight controls, short but sweet levels, and great boss fights (seriously, how have we not gotten a proper callback to Nightmare in another mainline kirby?) gives kirby a very mechanical interior, and that edge that really makes the game tick. Sure, the games lags quite often and using up on the d-pad to fly is kinda clunky, but those beautiful visuals and razor sharp gameplay, intertwining with one another, can suck you in (pun intended) and give you an experience like nothing else, even from other kirby games.

Me: Im taking shots of Dr. Pepper instead of alcohol during the backloggd tournament of twinkle star sprites!

Society: ok

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as Squidward: hello

Society: Holy shit Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as Squidward