ithil
Bio
Nothing here!
Badges
Noticed
Gained 3+ followers
Liked
Gained 10+ total review likes
On Schedule
Journaled games once a day for a week straight
GOTY '23
Participated in the 2023 Game of the Year Event
Shreked
Found the secret ogre page
2 Years of Service
Being part of the Backloggd community for 2 years
GOTY '22
Participated in the 2022 Game of the Year Event
Roadtrip
Voted for at least 3 features on the roadmap
Elite Gamer
Played 500+ games
Gamer
Played 250+ games
Organized
Created a list folder with 5+ lists
N00b
Played 100+ games
Favorite Games
614
Total Games Played
036
Played in 2024
2032
Games Backloggd
Recently Played See More
Recently Reviewed See More
This review contains spoilers
I played Dragon's Dogma II without having experienced the first one.
Like most open world games, I ended up spending a lot more than the estimated time to finish it, in order to experience as much of the game as I could (I saw all endings and decided to finish at lv.76). I had fun, but in my opinion the game was over-hyped.
What I liked
- Visuals. There wasn't a lot of variation in terms of biomes, but the scenery was gorgeous.
- Character creator. You could achieve impressive results. As always, more hairstyles and hair colours would have been welcome.
- Most vocations felt really different from each other. I started as an Archer but tried several others till I settled on the Magick Archer. There was another side to this I'll touch later.
- The sense of exploration, at least the first few dozens of hours, was great. At the beginning it would really surprise me with some arbitrary encounters unfolding in unexpected ways. I got vibes of Skyrim. Eventually it became repetitive, but again, this could be on me for overstaying my welcome.
- Boss fights were epic.
- Pawns as companions were an interesting mechanic.
Specially at the beginning-middle of the game you could easily write a cool story based on what happened on a random game session. This is probably the highlight of the game.
What I didn't like
- Story. I guess they didn't really worry too much about it to focus more on gameplay, but it was so inconsistent. It opened threads it never bothered to close. There was also a moment that made me rage as I was getting close to the end that caught me completely unaware and added some time pressure that eventually devolved into nothing.
- Characters lacked personality for the most part. In the case of pawns it is justified, but I didn't really care for most NPCs.
- Quests weren't particularly interesting. Friendship quests in particular were repetitive escort missions and they didn't even bother to randomize the destinations. There were also some completion bugs. Nothing serious, but I reached the end with a dead quest that should have failed.
- Lack of variety in enemies or bosses.
- The Dragonsplague was an interesting concept in theory, but the implementation left to be desired. I'd spent more than 50 hours till it first appeared, and then it was a pain in the a##e for a while to completely get rid of it. I felt no sense of threat and it didn't really add any compelling challenge; it just turned pawn management into a chore.
- Save system. I can see the point about feeling a deeper connection with your Arisen, so there's only a single profile, but some of the decisions regarding how saving works are odd, to put it mildly. At least they added the option to reset the game after a patch.
- I tried all vocations except for warrior/fighter and trickster. Even if I liked that they felt different, part of those differences involved an unbalance in terms of efficiency. Archer was ok but it lacked damage and both mage vocations were kind of frustrating (except for the levitate ability). Then I swapped to the thief and I could just rip enemies apart by smashing a button. With the magick archer I found my sweet spot, but it also felt significantly stronger than the mages.
- All flavours of lizard mobs and the stupid Dullahans 🔥😡🔥
- Portcrystal scarcity. The whole microtransaction controversy has muddied the developers' statement about being intentional, but even assuming good will on their side, I don't think this worked well, and I'm saying this as someone who preferred going to places by walking 80% of the time.
Like most open world games, I ended up spending a lot more than the estimated time to finish it, in order to experience as much of the game as I could (I saw all endings and decided to finish at lv.76). I had fun, but in my opinion the game was over-hyped.
What I liked
- Visuals. There wasn't a lot of variation in terms of biomes, but the scenery was gorgeous.
- Character creator. You could achieve impressive results. As always, more hairstyles and hair colours would have been welcome.
- Most vocations felt really different from each other. I started as an Archer but tried several others till I settled on the Magick Archer. There was another side to this I'll touch later.
- The sense of exploration, at least the first few dozens of hours, was great. At the beginning it would really surprise me with some arbitrary encounters unfolding in unexpected ways. I got vibes of Skyrim. Eventually it became repetitive, but again, this could be on me for overstaying my welcome.
- Boss fights were epic.
- Pawns as companions were an interesting mechanic.
Specially at the beginning-middle of the game you could easily write a cool story based on what happened on a random game session. This is probably the highlight of the game.
What I didn't like
- Story. I guess they didn't really worry too much about it to focus more on gameplay, but it was so inconsistent. It opened threads it never bothered to close. There was also a moment that made me rage as I was getting close to the end that caught me completely unaware and added some time pressure that eventually devolved into nothing.
- Characters lacked personality for the most part. In the case of pawns it is justified, but I didn't really care for most NPCs.
- Quests weren't particularly interesting. Friendship quests in particular were repetitive escort missions and they didn't even bother to randomize the destinations. There were also some completion bugs. Nothing serious, but I reached the end with a dead quest that should have failed.
- Lack of variety in enemies or bosses.
- The Dragonsplague was an interesting concept in theory, but the implementation left to be desired. I'd spent more than 50 hours till it first appeared, and then it was a pain in the a##e for a while to completely get rid of it. I felt no sense of threat and it didn't really add any compelling challenge; it just turned pawn management into a chore.
- Save system. I can see the point about feeling a deeper connection with your Arisen, so there's only a single profile, but some of the decisions regarding how saving works are odd, to put it mildly. At least they added the option to reset the game after a patch.
- I tried all vocations except for warrior/fighter and trickster. Even if I liked that they felt different, part of those differences involved an unbalance in terms of efficiency. Archer was ok but it lacked damage and both mage vocations were kind of frustrating (except for the levitate ability). Then I swapped to the thief and I could just rip enemies apart by smashing a button. With the magick archer I found my sweet spot, but it also felt significantly stronger than the mages.
- All flavours of lizard mobs and the stupid Dullahans 🔥😡🔥
- Portcrystal scarcity. The whole microtransaction controversy has muddied the developers' statement about being intentional, but even assuming good will on their side, I don't think this worked well, and I'm saying this as someone who preferred going to places by walking 80% of the time.
TL;DR - The setting alone makes the game worth it, but there are a few areas where it underdelivers. Because of this I consider it to be a flawed gem.
The depiction of an early 20th century alternative Warsaw under Russian control caught my attention when I first heard about the game. Historical elements and fiction blended nicely, and I loved the whole idea of thaumaturges, flaws and salutors.
This was clearly the big selling point of The Thaumaturge and it showed. I hope more devs follow the tracks of Fool's Theory and bring us more original, personal even, takes on fantasy.
Gameplay mechanics (exploration with a bit of detective work + turn-based combat) were fun in principle, and I was engaged with the plot and characters. All the ingredients seemed to be there for a new RPG favourite after Disco Elysium and Baldur's Gate 3.
Unfortunately, as the game went on I found that it failed to dive deep into most of these areas. Investigation mechanics became repetitive and posed no real deduction work. Likewise, the combat system features some really interesting elements, but I didn't need to (or felt compelled to) explore its possibilities and I ended up resorting to the same strategy most of the time. In normal difficulty I didn't really feel a challenge that made me adapt except for a couple of fights.
The character cast was varied and interesting, matching the game world, but once again, their treatment ended up being a bit shallow sometimes.
Dialogue sequences at times gave me the impression they weren't following a consistent order. Not sure if this could be due to localization issues (I played in Spanish or English and noticed this in both cases), scripting issues or oversights that didn't get caught by QA. Spanish localization was better than I expected, but I still noticed some mistranslations between text and voiced dialogue.
As for technical stuff, I played about half of the game on a high tier gaming laptop and the other half on a Steam Deck. I experienced no issues in the laptop but the fans were working overtime.
On the Deck it played reasonably well but there were occasional glitches in animations and a fair amount of crashes moving between locations. The game works on that platform without a lot of tinkering beyond manually selecting a Proton version, BUT the graphical settings are unnecessarily locked by default. Because of this it is currently flagged as Unsupported. Still, the graphical options can be easily unlocked using command line options.
And well, in both devices characters' facial expressions and animations in cutscenes or battle scenes sometimes fell into uncanny valley.
This review may have come up a bit harsh. It could be my frustration speaking because The Thaumaturge came really close to become a personal favourite but ultimately fell short. Despite that, I had a great time playing and I certainly recommend it.
I won't be replaying the game soon because of three B's (BG3, Balatro, Backlog) but I'm still curious about how differently you can shape Wiktor and what the other endings are. And I would definitely play a sequel or spinoff with the same setting.
The depiction of an early 20th century alternative Warsaw under Russian control caught my attention when I first heard about the game. Historical elements and fiction blended nicely, and I loved the whole idea of thaumaturges, flaws and salutors.
This was clearly the big selling point of The Thaumaturge and it showed. I hope more devs follow the tracks of Fool's Theory and bring us more original, personal even, takes on fantasy.
Gameplay mechanics (exploration with a bit of detective work + turn-based combat) were fun in principle, and I was engaged with the plot and characters. All the ingredients seemed to be there for a new RPG favourite after Disco Elysium and Baldur's Gate 3.
Unfortunately, as the game went on I found that it failed to dive deep into most of these areas. Investigation mechanics became repetitive and posed no real deduction work. Likewise, the combat system features some really interesting elements, but I didn't need to (or felt compelled to) explore its possibilities and I ended up resorting to the same strategy most of the time. In normal difficulty I didn't really feel a challenge that made me adapt except for a couple of fights.
The character cast was varied and interesting, matching the game world, but once again, their treatment ended up being a bit shallow sometimes.
Dialogue sequences at times gave me the impression they weren't following a consistent order. Not sure if this could be due to localization issues (I played in Spanish or English and noticed this in both cases), scripting issues or oversights that didn't get caught by QA. Spanish localization was better than I expected, but I still noticed some mistranslations between text and voiced dialogue.
As for technical stuff, I played about half of the game on a high tier gaming laptop and the other half on a Steam Deck. I experienced no issues in the laptop but the fans were working overtime.
On the Deck it played reasonably well but there were occasional glitches in animations and a fair amount of crashes moving between locations. The game works on that platform without a lot of tinkering beyond manually selecting a Proton version, BUT the graphical settings are unnecessarily locked by default. Because of this it is currently flagged as Unsupported. Still, the graphical options can be easily unlocked using command line options.
And well, in both devices characters' facial expressions and animations in cutscenes or battle scenes sometimes fell into uncanny valley.
This review may have come up a bit harsh. It could be my frustration speaking because The Thaumaturge came really close to become a personal favourite but ultimately fell short. Despite that, I had a great time playing and I certainly recommend it.
I won't be replaying the game soon because of three B's (BG3, Balatro, Backlog) but I'm still curious about how differently you can shape Wiktor and what the other endings are. And I would definitely play a sequel or spinoff with the same setting.
The first time I read about Balatro I saw it defined as "poker roguelite" and I wasn't particularly interested by the pitch. Some reviewers I follow lauded it as the next indie sensation like Loop Hero, Inscryption or Vampire Survivors were in the past, and that made me curious enough to try the demo during the latest Steam Fest.
By the time I got to Ante 2 in the tutorial run I had understood the praise.
The concept is simple, but the depth and variability makes it endlessly replayable and addicting as crack. After 20-something hours my joker collection is currently at 2/3, but the joy of discovering how a specific combination of jokers and card bonuses works together to break your high score remains.
Visuals and sound work great, they've put a lot of work on the details to make it feel satisfying (I have muted the music though, it became repetitive after a while).
Session length and controller support makes it a perfect game for commuting. I've played both on laptops and on my Steam Deck and it works great on either, except for a couple of minor annoyances using the latter:
- First, I'd recommend to tweak the input so you won't accidentally change focus with the touchpads.
- Also, perhaps as a consequence of the former, selecting cards from large hands (for example, +3 or 4 over the default hand size) could be glitchy.
By the time I got to Ante 2 in the tutorial run I had understood the praise.
The concept is simple, but the depth and variability makes it endlessly replayable and addicting as crack. After 20-something hours my joker collection is currently at 2/3, but the joy of discovering how a specific combination of jokers and card bonuses works together to break your high score remains.
Visuals and sound work great, they've put a lot of work on the details to make it feel satisfying (I have muted the music though, it became repetitive after a while).
Session length and controller support makes it a perfect game for commuting. I've played both on laptops and on my Steam Deck and it works great on either, except for a couple of minor annoyances using the latter:
- First, I'd recommend to tweak the input so you won't accidentally change focus with the touchpads.
- Also, perhaps as a consequence of the former, selecting cards from large hands (for example, +3 or 4 over the default hand size) could be glitchy.