Reviews from

in the past


Waiting for them to fill this up with content and ill be back in.

The amount of paid DLC is gross and the game crashed within 30 minutes of playing. It seems like most sim/4X/strategy games on PC are expensive. The game didn't hold my attention, either. It seems deep, but the DLC bothers me.

Por algum motivo eu não acho tão bom quanto o 2.

Crusader Kings 3 é um 4X focado no roleplay de um personagem (e consequentemente a dinastia dele) no periodo medieval (alta e baixa idade media) que é simplesmente único no mercado. Você tem milhares de horas de simulações orgânicas que lhe renderão dezenas de milhares de crônicas divertidas.

A única coisa que me quebra nesse jogo é as merda de DLC que lança a cada 3 meses e eu COMPRO pq sou viciado.


This game is the first game in a while to take so much of my time without realizing it.

The only cons are the constant plagues and the slow processing when you have already conquered half of the world. I couldn't stomp a rebelion because the game was moving so slow. That's what happens when the NPC's decide to siege 30 of your cities in a row.

One of the best games I have ever played. Gets Boring after a long while but there are mods to combat that.

considering it was the first strategy game like this that I had ever played, i found it quite easy to get into and enjoy, it's definitely more fun with friends, which i unfortunately lack

100 horas de jogo e eu ainda não sei jogar.
10/10

Durante una semana me he abandonado sólo por jugar a esto. Luego se me hizo muy repetitivo, pero esa semana no me la quita nadie.

My review for the second in this series speaks for itself, and as a result any follow up is going to have a lot to live up to. The game looks nice and runs smoother, and there are some things that does better than the previous entry. But the thing that I feel the game lacks is the real ability to make your own stories, random events etc, hopefully this will improve with time and dlcs.

One of the best (strategy) games I have ever played!
Nice improvement over CK2.

Je penses que je joue très mal a ce jeu mais c'est pas grave parce que c'est très rigolo.
Ce jeu là c'est un générateur d'histoire, y a des parties que j'ai fait il y a 4 ans, et je m'en souviens encore aujourd'hui, parce que j'ai créé des légendes !
C'est dur a apprendre, mais bordel ça en vaut la peine

I'll probably be doing playthroughs of CK3 intermittently for the rest of my life

Muito ruim no Xbox series, eu fiz 5 runs e nas 5 chega uma hora que buga o save state e quando eu tento salvar o jogo fecha sozinho e não consigo mais entrar naquele save que fiz assim tendo que começar de novo, e uma pena já que eu curto o jogo mais e impossível de jogar, pq sempre mais cedo ou mais tarde acontece isso

Paradox is so greedy that the full version of this game will cost you well over 200 bux (aud) because they sell their updates to the game as overpriced DLC, the base game is practically a $70 demo, its barebones without the updates.

I do love the concept of this game, but it's so confusing and complex that you need to be a master of the series with hundreds of hours to have the most basic idea of what's happening. This isn't a game like civ or a rts where you learn things synchronously as you play. The game just throws you into it and youre expected to know what to do.

The tutorial does an ok job teaching you the real basic stuff (i did it 3 times), but once I jumped into a real game I had no idea what was going on, I was already getting invaded and bombarded with different messages and buttons and I just could not be bothered. You could sit and watch videos and read guides but I feel if you have to go online to study a game it just isn't worth it (for me).

Its just real sad that a company like paradox has a monopoly on these types of games, and instead of providing a complete and fun experience for fans of the genre, they choose to milk them for all they got instead because they know that no real competition exists.



Crusader Kings 2 was shat out into the world about 12 years ago. By the time its successor came out it'd developed a reputation as a game that was barebones without any DLC but was a gripping and indepth time-abyss if you had most/all of it.

Crusader Kings 3 decides to iterate on its predecessor by being a game that's barebones without any DLC, and still barebones even with all the extortionately overpriced DLC.

It is an inevitability in first-party Paradox titles that the player will eventually stumble into a period of empty space where all they're doing is advancing time at 5x speed until some events pop up and let you do something. Even Stellaris, the game that most often has you actively doing things, tends to fall into it at some point.

CK3 is sadly the worst for it, in part due to numerous under-the-hood changes that at first seem beneficial but in reality seem drab. Paradox's approach this time round involves dissuading players from attempting to colour the map as in past games and instead focus on a small corner of the world - whether it be a kingdom or an Empire, they don't want you playing with adult colouring books this time.

Instead the focus this time is on roleplay and/or kingdom management, with hefty penalties to expansion and harsh limits on how much you as an individual can control directly before needing to shove things onto your vassals. The game, including its tutorials, not-so-subtly nudge you into grabbing hold of a title and clinging to it. New and reworked mechanics like culture/religion/councils/language and more with DLCs all add to this; the focus of this game is in finding a place and staying there.

Unfortunately this focus results in a lot of waiting, as almost all of the mechanics up above boil down to clicking a button and waiting for a scheme to resolve. The much-praised Tours & Tournaments and Royal Court DLCs are much the same despite their praise, simply offering you more buttons before the wait begins rather than just one. It's all rather at odds with the intent to make you more actively partake in your realm's management, because in practice it's all very passive.
Further dulling matters is that many events often boil down to very static, very predictable stat checks. Oh, someone's trying to murder your son - who is 9th in line to the throne and has more defects than limbs? It's just a passive intrigue and scheme power check. Duelling? Martial and Prowess stats.
Much of these additional stats like Prowess were added to make the game less binary, but given how they scale it's relatively easy to stack the deck in your favour unless you gimp yourself...

But even then, this game's biggest problem is that it's easy. Metagaming is no longer required to stack ridiculous bonuses in your court, especially given the relative prominence of random lowborn courtiers with insane stat spreads. CK3 tries its damndest to have consequences for this, but what use is a hit to your legitimacy when you can pump out children that're functionally immune to rebellion, assassination, or the perils of inbreeding?
The DLCs just make this worse, as most of them are nearly consequence-free. Tours & Tournaments is a series of easy resource/stat boosts for relatively low risk, Royal Court is the same and both of them make socializing so much easier. Northern Lords supercharges a lot of the northern factions, and-

You know, CK2 had a bit of a problem with Eurocentrism, to the point where most non-European factions needed a paid DLC to be playable. Even then, it was almost always the titular Crusader King nations/cultures that got all of the updates and boosts.

CK3 seemingly averts this by having everyone on the map be playable, but it doesn't take a genius to notice that the non-European factions feel distinctly undercooked. Muslims can't even observe Ramadan. As expected from a CK title, Paradox sell the fixes back to you via Fate of Iberia and Legacy of Persia, but even these feel half-hearted and empty compared to equivalent CK2 packs. Go even further East and it's like wading into unfinished content.

I think what really broke this game for me is the lack of impact anything has. The first time a council member blackmails you with your own incest/kinslaying, it seems like a grand obstacle to be surmounted, but oftentimes it's a total non-issue. In my most recent game, everyone and their mum tried to expose me for pulling a Habsburg on my bloodline, but the end result was a few minor opinion penalties that were easily swept away by holding a Grand Wedding. It feels a lot like playing a mod for CK2 that's perpetually in beta; wowed by all the options available until they fire and you realize that you've functionally just skipped a stone across bathwater.

...Also I realized halfway into my conquest of Britannia as the Irish that the devs had forced a Legitimacy mechanic on me and that I couldn't meaningfully engage with it without forking out money for the recent Legends Of The Dead pack. Hurray!

The best way to experience this game is to read people's (probably made up) campaign stories on Reddit, for much of this game's remaining appeal is in doing stupid shit like banging the pope, and for once that's attainable without touching the game.

It's been four years and CK3 still feels as hollow and unfulfilling as it did when it came out.

Only good if you're willing to shell out quite a bit of money for expansions that have mechanics that should've been in the base game. Like the black plague. In a medieval simulation.

esse jogo tem tudo de bom, matar criança, incesto, executar 50 pessoas presas na sua corte, só coisa boa

Crusader Kings III is an amazing strategic rpg that has so much content. There is a crazy amount of stuff to do, you could start a religion, you could conquer the globe, or you could just grow your family until you have 425 generations.

Although there are some issues, whilst this was is an awesome game and one I would usually really enjoy (and I mean REALLY enjoy) Crusader kings just falls short, I can really only play it for an hour or two before I start to get bored. I think this has to do with a lack of an end goal. Other than this this though I would still recommend this to someone who wants to play a good strategic rpg.

Definitely my favourite paradox game and the most polished by far, while it’s not my most played yet I imagine it will be in time. It lacks a lot that it’s predecessor had, but over time the updates are starting to trend in a direction that makes me excited for the future of the game and I hope it only gets better, and what it lacks is made up for in the clean presentation and some more fleshed out systems

Paradox Interactive's third foray into medieval dynasty grand strategy modernizes the classic series at the cost of losing a few of the things that made Crusader Kings II (2012) so enjoyable. Control a dynasty from the late 800s to the 1400s, and use diplomacy, war, and subterfuge to control counties, duchies, kingdoms, and even empires. The map and the characters have been made fully 3D, which is a pleasant improvement from 2D headshots of characters and a map that looked like it was pulled from Creative Assembly's Medieval II: Total War (2006). While you do lose a lot of the features that were introduced in CK2's DLC, the game has been remade and reimagined to bring back those features back in an improved state, and to introduce new gameplay that was not possible in CK2. If you're a fan of strategy games, or if you enjoy games that encourage roleplay, this game will have no difficulty stealing a couple hundred hours from you. Just be aware that this still a Paradox game: you get a pretty good base game experience, but a lot of the fluff and improvements will come in the form of paid DLC.

I don't know exactly why this game messes me up so bad, but there's something about kidnapping my traitor of a nephew and shrewdly binding him into a childless wedlock so he won't be able to produce competitors against my own offspring that makes my brain go brrrr.

Great, but not to the heights of CK2 yet, also deducting a half star because of Paradox's greed.


estou completamente viciada não consigo nem olhar pra outro jogo

i dropped $80 on this on release for some reason. another game i'm too fucking stupid for and that must mean it's bad

It misses that CK2 feel that made fall in love with the genre in the first place, Idk I might give another chance in the future with a different prospective, but It's not a bad game by any means.

CK2 was perfect, but CK3 finally has enough improvements that I consider it to be the superior experience.