ninjaxc30
2007
One of my least favorite phrases that you see a lot on the internet is “it's a good game, just not a good “x” game”. Like, are your preconceived notions of what your favorite game series should be so narrow and unimaginative that anything out of the ordinary is immediately put into the “other” category? Or is it more of an effort to weakly defend your tastes by “othering” it, automatically conceding that it's not a real “x” game? Either way I hate when people do that and I hate this game. It's an abysmal game AND an abysmal Crash game
2005
1996
2023
1998
Fixes most of the Spyro 2 issues like bad pacing, lame collectables, and the backtracking is better designed and much easier to skip. Seriously, you can skip all the backtracking with a youtube search and a couple minutes of attempts at most. The new characters are more interesting to play than Spyro 2's minigames, the story, world, and characters are more developed, and the levels are overall more fun. Still has some annoying minigames and it probably wasn’t the best idea to add FIVE new playable characters, (maybe add two or three and develop them further), but it’s a good final entry in the series. Wish they made a fourth one that was an actual game. Toys for Bob if you can hear us please save us Toys for Bob
just awful in pretty much every way. level design is tedious and convoluted, enemies and bosses are either incredibly annoying gimmicks, or they're just comatose and basically let you kill them. story sucks. lady and trish and crazy underutilized, and antagonists have zero character whatsoever. where the fuck is Vergil? Nero is almost cool but unfortunately his primary mechanic feels janky as hell. on top of all that there's maybe a third of actual content. dumbass game is so lucky DMC2 exists
2001
2004