Apesar da curta duração, eu gostei da experiência. Kojima traz uma grande inovação nesse game que serve como a prequel de The Phantom Pain.

Gráficos são muito bons
Trilha sonora eu achei OK, talvez se eu pudesse jogar o Phantom Pain eu analisaria melhor haha
Jogabilidade muito boa e etc

Resumindo tudo: Prequel muito boa

This was a single mission acting as a demo for the main game, showing off a few weapons and mechanics. Calling this a fully fledged game is a joke, giving it a physical release is insulting, and the price tage of thirty plus is ridiculous. It is a vertical slice showing a little bit of the game, and while the mission setup with the story is good, it also is the first replacement of David Hayter. Keifer Sunderland isn't that impressive. Just watch a YouTube video instead of buying and playing this yourself and move on to The Phantom Pain.

Still better than Redfall though.

Now, this game had the potential to set the stage for an epic experience with "Phantom Pain." But here's the kicker – it falls short, real short.

Sure, the gameplay is tight, the graphics are top-notch, and sneaking around like a ninja in the dead of night is as thrilling as ever. But let's address the elephant in the room – this game is shorter than my attention span during a boring lecture.

I mean, seriously, you can blast through the main mission in less time than it takes to brew a pot of coffee. And don't even get me started on the price tag. Paying full price for what essentially amounts to a glorified demo? No thanks, Konami.

Now, don't get me wrong, there's some cool stuff here. The open-world design gives you plenty of freedom to approach objectives however you see fit, and the stealth mechanics are as polished as Snake's boots. But at the end of the day, it just leaves you craving more – and not in a good way.

So yeah, "Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes" might whet your appetite for the main course that is "Phantom Pain," but it's hard to shake the feeling that you've been shortchanged. Here's hoping the next installment makes up for this misstep.

I think Metal Gear Solid V is really underrated, so much so that if you say that MGSV is the best in the series, the community will probably call you "new-gen" (stupid term but wtv). But people really underrate art styles and "aesthetic"(??). Im talking about the atmosphere and way of telling a story. Games like any other art form have the ability to convey emotions and portray a story, but games can have so many different ways of doing that. With that said, I love the tone change of MGS to a much more serious and movie-like storytelling, this games atmosphere is immaculate and a nice change from the slight goof that MGS games used to have. The gameplay is a huge change and a good one too, generally considered the best in the series. The price is a bit high but definetely get this on sale.

The critical reception of this game was absolutely criminal and one of the first times I realised how disgustingly immature games "journalism" was.

Apparently, according to people who are seemingly so passionate about games they make their living writing/talking about them, games are simply a product of which value is determined based on consumer cost and length of what they arbitrarily define to be the core experience - even if the entire point of the game is not rushing through it once to see a fucking cutscene and move on with your life like disposable entertainment.

This shit hit Hitman (2016) really bad as well.