EldestBrisingr
I get why some consider this to be the worst of the trilogy. We've already been to Rapture. What else is there to tell? However, this expectation ends up working in the game's favor. The gameplay is better with a less intrusive hacking minigame, upgradable plasmids, and more decisions to consider with the little sisters. Top that off with a deeply personal story and a DLC that is among the best in video games, and BioShock 2 ends up being an improvement over its predecessor.
2016
BioShock’s setting and story are great, but the latter loses a lot of momentum after the WTF moment. Couple this with gameplay that gets repetitive by the halfway point, and you have a game that is still worth playing, but somewhat overrated.
2016
Dark Souls III has the opposite problems of its numbered predecessor. Its gameplay is very fluid and the bosses are generally great, but the setting and level design are uninspired.
While not as tightly designed as its predecessor, it did try some new ideas in terms of mechanics and level design. As a sequel, its heart was in the right place and for that alone its worth remembering.
This review contains spoilers
I loved Ori and the Blind Forest, so logically this game should be better with all of its additions, right? Well, no. To me, the game's additions only serve to highlight how unfocused it really is.
I'll quickly go over the positives. The game looks incredible and the level design is great, sometimes brilliant. Ori feels great to control when platforming. These are very important in a platformer, so everything checks out there. Everything else, not so much.
The bosses were not fun at all. The excessive visual flourishes and 2.5D art style make it difficult to see and determine where the hitboxes are, which makes contact damage extremely annoying. The floaty platforming physics also do not pair well with these bosses, especially since the preceding enemies are never complex enough to prepare players for the multi-phased bosses.
Enemy variety is also disappointing. The first game admittedly only had a handful of enemies, but the combat was never emphasized as much as in Will of the Wisps. The new combat isn't much deeper than its predecessor (mash a button and occasionally evade) and yet you still fight a lot of the same enemies. Attacking enemies also stops Ori in place, a downgrade from Blind Forest letting you weave through enemy bullets while attacking.
The story was extremely disappointing. It was essentially a weaker version of the first game's story (save the forest). I did not feel for Ku when she died because the game barely gave me time to spend with her. Shriek is a weaker version of Kuro from Blind Forest because she has no redemption arc. Why did the game feel the need to have more dialogue too? The first game barely had any and its story was still very well-told.
Remember how Sein in Blind Forest would attack enemies for Ori? That was because Ori was peaceful by nature. As such, he only attacked when absolutely necessary. In Will of the Wisps, Ori shreds through enemies all the time because it's what you do in an action-adventure game. That sums up Will of the Wisps very well. Gorgeous at times, but ultimately feels like it was made to cater to the masses instead of being a unique work of art.
I'll quickly go over the positives. The game looks incredible and the level design is great, sometimes brilliant. Ori feels great to control when platforming. These are very important in a platformer, so everything checks out there. Everything else, not so much.
The bosses were not fun at all. The excessive visual flourishes and 2.5D art style make it difficult to see and determine where the hitboxes are, which makes contact damage extremely annoying. The floaty platforming physics also do not pair well with these bosses, especially since the preceding enemies are never complex enough to prepare players for the multi-phased bosses.
Enemy variety is also disappointing. The first game admittedly only had a handful of enemies, but the combat was never emphasized as much as in Will of the Wisps. The new combat isn't much deeper than its predecessor (mash a button and occasionally evade) and yet you still fight a lot of the same enemies. Attacking enemies also stops Ori in place, a downgrade from Blind Forest letting you weave through enemy bullets while attacking.
The story was extremely disappointing. It was essentially a weaker version of the first game's story (save the forest). I did not feel for Ku when she died because the game barely gave me time to spend with her. Shriek is a weaker version of Kuro from Blind Forest because she has no redemption arc. Why did the game feel the need to have more dialogue too? The first game barely had any and its story was still very well-told.
Remember how Sein in Blind Forest would attack enemies for Ori? That was because Ori was peaceful by nature. As such, he only attacked when absolutely necessary. In Will of the Wisps, Ori shreds through enemies all the time because it's what you do in an action-adventure game. That sums up Will of the Wisps very well. Gorgeous at times, but ultimately feels like it was made to cater to the masses instead of being a unique work of art.
2017
The only game I've played that recaptured Dark Souls' magic, Hollow Knight is the total package. Others have spoken at length on what they love about this game. I could talk about the incredible world design, thrilling bosses, amazing music, and surprisingly deep gameplay, but what's always stood out to me is how gratifying the exploration is.
A lot of Metroidvanias fall into the trap of having collectibles or equipment that are not very fun for certain players to use because of their playstyle. Hollow Knight's charms (the main collectible outside of power-ups) avoid this issue because you need to find them in order to buy more slots for equipping them. The charms work like badges in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, giving the player options to buff their character, with the most powerful charms taking up the most space. Because charms must be found to buy more slots, a player will not feel like they wasted their time finding one they don't like since that charm will eventually allow them to equip more charms they do like. It's a small, but brilliant touch that makes exploration rewarding even on subsequent playthroughs.
The intrinsic desire to explore exists in the hearts of most gamers and Hollow Knight not only delivers on that, but maintains it long after you expect to have found everything.
A lot of Metroidvanias fall into the trap of having collectibles or equipment that are not very fun for certain players to use because of their playstyle. Hollow Knight's charms (the main collectible outside of power-ups) avoid this issue because you need to find them in order to buy more slots for equipping them. The charms work like badges in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, giving the player options to buff their character, with the most powerful charms taking up the most space. Because charms must be found to buy more slots, a player will not feel like they wasted their time finding one they don't like since that charm will eventually allow them to equip more charms they do like. It's a small, but brilliant touch that makes exploration rewarding even on subsequent playthroughs.
The intrinsic desire to explore exists in the hearts of most gamers and Hollow Knight not only delivers on that, but maintains it long after you expect to have found everything.
I grew up playing Nintendo games and still play them. Suffice to say I did not think this type of game would appeal to me. How wrong I was! Dark Souls is exceptional in many ways, but I feel its appeal is widely misunderstood. The game is difficult, sure, but if a game's status is defined by its difficulty, then why are easier game franchises like Kirby still appreciated? No, Dark Souls is a masterpiece because of how unpredictable, yet focused its world is. New ideas and enemy encounters are introduced in every level. At times, they border on being frustrating. And yet, I couldn't stop playing.
The cherry on top of these expertly-designed challenges is the absolutely sublime level design. Levels provide shortcuts after overcoming a challenge that link back to your current bonfire (checkpoint). These shortcuts are smartly placed to give players a moment of respite after overcoming seemingly impossible odds.
This setup alone makes for a pretty good game, but there are even more things to marvel at in Dark Souls. For those who have yet to play it, I will not spoil these secrets. And if you need any advice going in, it would be to have two things: patience and humility. The former because the game is challenging and the latter because the game's challenges are fair, with very few exceptions. I once thought the game was unreasonable, but I persevered and was rewarded for it. If you stick with it, you will never forget your experience. There is a reason why so many games have tried imitating it with very little success.
The cherry on top of these expertly-designed challenges is the absolutely sublime level design. Levels provide shortcuts after overcoming a challenge that link back to your current bonfire (checkpoint). These shortcuts are smartly placed to give players a moment of respite after overcoming seemingly impossible odds.
This setup alone makes for a pretty good game, but there are even more things to marvel at in Dark Souls. For those who have yet to play it, I will not spoil these secrets. And if you need any advice going in, it would be to have two things: patience and humility. The former because the game is challenging and the latter because the game's challenges are fair, with very few exceptions. I once thought the game was unreasonable, but I persevered and was rewarded for it. If you stick with it, you will never forget your experience. There is a reason why so many games have tried imitating it with very little success.