1996

A snood (/snuːd/) is a type of traditionally female headgear designed to hold the hair in a cloth or yarn bag.[1] In the most common form, the headgear resembles a close-fitting hood worn over the back of the head. It is similar to a hairnet,[1] but snoods typically have a looser fit,[2] a much coarser mesh, and noticeably thicker yarn. A tighter-mesh band may cover the forehead or crown, then run behind the ears, and under the nape of the neck. A sack of sorts dangles from this band, covering and containing the fall of long hair gathered at the back. A snood sometimes was made of solid fabric, but more often of loosely knitted yarn or other net-like material. Historically (and in some cultures still in use today) a small bag of fine thread—netted, tatted, knitted, crocheted, or knotted (see macramé)—enclosed a bob of long hair on the back of the head or held it close to the nape.[3]

Beard snood
Another similar garment which is also referred to as a snood is used to cover facial hair such as beards and moustaches when working in environments such as food production.[4] Although it appears that "hairnet" has replaced "snood" as the common term for hair containment on the head, the term "beard snood" (essentially a "ringed scarf") is still familiar in many food production facilities.[citation needed]

Religious use
Women's snoods are often worn by married Orthodox Jewish women,[5] according to the religious requirement of hair covering (see Tzniut). Since these snoods are designed to cover the hair more than hold it,[6] they are often lined to prevent them from being see-through. Contemporary hair snoods for Jewish women come in a wide range of colors and designs.[7]

Snoods are also worn by some Christian women as a headcovering in obedience to 1 Corinthians 11:2–10.

A beautiful game with a lot of great mechanics that's just... missing something. I enjoy playing it, but don't come back to it often. Combined with a few design weaknesses, it just doesn't really sing like it could. It's just not quite there. Quite fun regardless! Worth playing if you love these kinds of games like me!

1994

A promising premise (using the ball is an interesting mechanic) with some pretty stunning animation, unfortunately hampered by sluggish controls and pretty forgettable level design

i had an idea for exactly this a while back and im glad someone else did, because now i dont have to deal with the fact that my game idea wasnt very good

Really solid game feel, for what it's worth. Game is bad, though.

Love the art and love the message, but unfortunately, the game part is really frustrating!

I recognize that there is great artistry in this game, and that it is high quality, but I just never really clicked with it. As much as I adored the art style, I just never really felt sunk into the feel or world the game presented to me.

for some reason i cannot comprehend the image of a gameboy sprite of a candy mushroom is burned into my brain and i want nothing more than to escape this memory

It's alright! It's mostly a re-invention of the first game with changes here and there. Much less difficult, too. It feels a little less exciting because of that, but it's still a really fun game.

Also, Red's design is so cute and good and I love her.

Very bad game with a very good Game Over theme

You can tell there are good ideas here, but good god it's aged like warm milk.

A half decent Zelda game ruined by one fatal flaw: having to do the same dungeon over, and over, and over again. Absolutely awful design. Shame, since the rest of the game is fine enough.

little nemo is the original 3d mario

A good example of what happens when you layer too many mechanics on top of each-other without enough refinement or cohesion. It's fine, but it's so much that it actually just becomes unmemorable.