For years people said that Pokémon games were the worst they've ever been. However they decided to stop that by making a game so bad that it is impossible to make a worse game ever. Even if the next game is just a menu screen that thanks you for giving all your money to Game Freak, you can still say "at least it's better than those gen 4 remakes."

Call of Duty number 23 is still more unique than this in their respective series.

Very fun. All the different game mechanics interacting ends up making for some interesting puzzles. The graphics are incredibly detailed for a game trying to emulate 90s-era graphics, which makes it feel like how those games actually felt when you played them at the time.

Decent little rogue-like. Fun to play co-op.

Atrocious game, may make a decent book.

Every level is the same, all alternate paths are just incentives to pay up for more overpriced toys. All that to say, pretty fun to play co-op.

Tried to get in on the toys to life genre way too late. Sandbox is fun for what it is but the artstyle is like the average of all these properties and just looks like the most generic thing possible.

Better than most say. Worse than some say.

Not very fun. Aged poorly if it was any good to begin with.

The relatively mundane setting of Montana ends up making a fun contrast to other Far Cry games, and also makes it more funny to see all the crazy cultist people. I do not like Far Cry games for their ending at all, but this game may just have the dumbest ones out of all the games.

Very mundane, there are a million games just like this and they are all better.

Dreadfully boring, and I have played every farming game under the sun!

Feels undercooked and like a compromise between 3d world and odyssey that ends up weaker than both. I fear this was meant to be a full-fledged game but they just needed to ship something with the 3d world port.

Love the setting, like the gameplay, hate the ending.

Lethal Company if it got boring in two hours.