Cute little game about wrecking house. It’s fun, low stakes, and doesn’t overstay its welcome—one of my favorite kinds of games.

There are a lot of ideas packed into its short runtime. It’s no wonder this inspired Portal 2. Even with the rough edges of a “student game”, it’s worth a playthrough.

Novel, fun movement is one of my favorite things about a game, and this experiment is almost completely built around a unique moveset. There are just hints of a wider story, but the draw here is fluid grappling and jumping, and it mostly works. The combat, on the other hand, will need some retooling in a full release, but as a proof of concept, this has some real promise!

An exceedingly clever puzzle game. There's not much to be said about this game that hasn't been said already, but I'm glad I finally got around to it. I now see the appeal.

Playing this took me back to the age of average games—when 7 out of 10s were prevalent and I was happy to simply see another entry of a favorite franchise. I didn’t understand the criticism of this game until I played it and realized how hollow it is—three maps with repetitive gameplay and a nonsense story. The fun variety is fun and feels better than the original, but it’s still uninspired.

The better of the DLC episodes, this one focuses more on puzzle solving and leans into surrealist interpretations of the environnements to good effect. It’s interesting and surprising, though neither DLCs advance the story significantly.

The worse of the DLC, it leans into my least favorite aspect of the original game—the combat. It throws interminable waves of obnoxious enemies in areas that are largely retreads.

I’m officially abandoning this one. I loved the original and even played through the DLC, but this one seemed to lack a certain “je ne sais quoi”. Was it that the levels lacked the Mario-flair of the original? That certainly didn’t help this outing, the the level design is much more engaging this time around. I think my biggest detraction is the difficulty: it’s just too easy. I don’t think I played the original on hard, and I’m not tactical genius, but this was kinda boring on even the hardest difficulty. I also think there were too many battles—cut it in half and ratchet up the intensity of each one and I’d be curious to see if I would enjoy it more.

I almost wrote off I Am Dead. My first impression was that it was twee with little to say or do. But I stuck with it as it was short and didn’t ask much of the player (and I’m a sucker for a short game). By the halfway point in the game, it became apparent I was writing off this game too early and that there was a deeper tale unfolding about memory, death, and legacy. While the gameplay is simple and amounts to little more than a hidden object game with the ability to look into objects, it was satisfying to match your understanding of the character and their memory to the lost object. And there is some startling truth to the gameplay—memories are all that are left of the dead, and these are often connected to objects. Lives are revealed by looking deeper and peeling back layers. It may be cliche that the outsiders and oddballs in this world turn out to be misunderstood sweethearts, yet most of their stories had enough dimension that these revelations felt “earned”. And the larger story of the island was interesting though incomplete with its interconnected history. In the end, the game reminded me that each life leaves an indelible, if unnoticed, mark on the places and people where it lived.

A visual novel with the stylings of a nature documentary set on a foreign planet, player interaction is limited to advancing the story from page to page and occasionally investigating a highlighted word. The story is engaging, though I’m predisposed to this sort of story as a nature doc fan, so your mileage may vary. It’s largest detraction is that there’s nothing that would keep this from being a graphic novel—it doesn’t harness the media of video gaming in any novel ways.

I’m not much for an on-rail shooter, but this one has the pedigree that made it worth a try. It wasn’t enough to change my taste, though I had fun for its brief runtime.

A quaint little fairy tale with some clever ideas.

It must be good because I didn’t mind replaying the beginning on a few different occasions, most recently losing my save after clearing three worlds and not minding restarting to finally finish it. There are some very memorable levels, and the challenge is just right (most of the time).

While a slight game eclipsed by Nintendo’s best on the platform, it’s a fun, uncomplicated platformer with some clear inspiration for the games that follow it.

Manifold Gardens is a conundrum. I enjoy the puzzles and the visuals, but I don’t love the process of finding the puzzles. Exploration is a good opportunity to see the stunning worlds, but their mind-warping architecture isn’t easy to navigate and it makes simply locating what you’re “supposed” to do frustrating. It’s an unavoidable byproduct of the Escherian worlds and perhaps the problem is in my drive to solve the next puzzle instead of merely sightseeing.